{"id":721,"date":"2011-02-21T16:09:33","date_gmt":"2011-02-21T16:09:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/?p=721"},"modified":"2014-06-24T18:19:24","modified_gmt":"2014-06-24T17:19:24","slug":"the-league-of-extraordinary-gentlemen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/?p=721","title":{"rendered":"THE LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/lxg.jpg\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/lxg.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-722\" title=\"lxg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/lxg.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"285\" \/><\/a><\/a>Comics, at least in the hands of a talented creative teams, are a  much denser medium than film. Comics can encompass more visual  information and more complex literary ideas, page for page, than a film  script. This is certainly true of Stephen Norrington\u2019s attempt to  convert Alan Moore and Kevin O\u2019Neill\u2019s <em>The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen<\/em> to the big screen. For reasons that are too often the director\u2019s fault,  it cannot match its source for intelligence, style or drama.<\/h3>\n<p><!--more-->Film images flash past at twenty\u2013four frames a second and, at least  in the cinema, cannot be pored over in the same way as a comic book  frame. Technically, then, <em>The League<\/em> on screen cannot match the  visual richness of the comic. One of the book\u2019s great appeals, the way  in which O\u2019Neill filled every panel on every page with entertaining  incidental detail, is inevitably lost.<\/p>\n<p>Norrington\u2019s <em>The League<\/em>, if never matching O\u2019Neill\u2019s art, at  least manages to develop an appealing look of its own. The opening  sequence in Africa, Dorian Gray\u2019s library and the interior of the  Nautilus are, in their own way, well designed and stylish. Sadly the one  element of the design that survives from the comic books almost intact \u2013  Mr Hyde is fairly faithfully transferred thanks to CGI \u2013 is the least  convincing of the film\u2019s special effects. I especially hated the  badly-handled transformation sequences and the way the blobby,  indistinct Hyde never seems to properly connect with the world around  him.<\/p>\n<p>However, if the look of the film is reasonably successful, the script  and plot seriously disappoint. Film adaptations rarely manage to  encompass the same degree of character development and complexity as  their literary sources. Alan Moore\u2019s <em>The League<\/em> covered a lot of  ground so it is not entirely surprising that the film fails to match the  scope of the original. What is disappointing, however, is the way in  which the film fails to even aspire to a similar degree of intelligence.  Norrington\u2019s film is clich\u00e9d in a way that Moore\u2019s work never is, the  dialogue is, in places, unbearably stiff and there are gaping holes in  the story\u2019s logic.<\/p>\n<p>The film\u2019s nadir is a sequence where The League must save Venice from  being sunk by a big bomb in the foundations of the city\u2019s buildings.  The filmmakers seem to believe that the city of Venice is built out into  the Adriatic on stilts rather than on an island, which rather sums up  the stupidity of this sequence. From the moment that the  aircraft\u2013carrier\u2013sized Nautilus sails up a Venetian canal to the  villains\u2019 inevitable escape, the whole misadventure is nonsensical and  ineptly realised. The action and dialogue are turgid, the ideas  ridiculous and the whole thing is just infuriatingly bad.<\/p>\n<p>But the bigger problems come from the way Norrington has messed  around with the source material. The introduction of Tom Sawyer (the  wooden Shane West), presumably to give American audiences someone to  \u201croot\u201d for is a serious mistake. <em>The League<\/em> was essentially be  Quatermain\u2019s story but the introduction of Tom Sawyer robs Quatermain of  any serious opportunities for character development, gets in the way of  his action scenes and adds nothing to the group dynamic. Dorian Gray\u2019s  replacement of Quatermain as Mina Harker\u2019s \u201clove interest\u201d further  diminishes the role of the protagonist.<\/p>\n<p>Sean Connery was always going to be too vital a screen presence to  succeed as the rather wasted and embittered old hero in Moore\u2019s  original. Still, Connery\u2019s screen persona is curmudgeonly enough these  days to suggest that, given the chance, he could have made a success of  the role. He never gets that chance as the reworking of the plot removes  all his character\u2019s interesting potentials and it is easy to see how,  as rumours suggest, he might have become frustrated at the treatment of  his character and the wasting of his talents.<\/p>\n<p>However, not all the changes are for the worse. Dorian Gray\u2019s  introduction may help unbalance the whole story but Stuart Townsend is  fabulously over the top in the role. As an invulnerable immortal he is  wonderfully <em>louche<\/em> and gets almost all of the film\u2019s scarce good  lines. Pausing to heal during a fight with an equally immortal and  indestructible foe he quickly becomes bored and sighs camply: \u201cWe\u2019ll be  at this all day!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Issues over character rights apparently prevented the use of Hawley  Griffin as The Invisible Man, but I rather liked his replacement, a  wideboy thief named Rodney Skinner (Tony Curran) who stole the potion.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, however, it is the script that drags Norrington\u2019s <em>The League <\/em>down  from the ranks of the merely misguided to the truly awful. It is full  of painfully obvious, pointless statements. So, Naseeruddin Shah (who  otherwise does a rather good job as Captain Nemo) is forced to point to a  (ludicrously out-of-place) sports car and declaim: \u201cI call it an  aut-o-mo-bile.\u201d And Quatermain shouts: \u201cVenice still stands!\u201d when half  of the city has been flattened.<\/p>\n<p>None of these characters speak or act like their literary originals.  Moore, in the comic book version, takes liberties but, at least, he  brought a knowledge and understanding of these characters to the page.  With Norrington\u2019s version you are simply left to wonder why they  bothered calling the characters Quatermain or Harker. They might as well  be called Smith or Jones. They bear no relation to their supposed  source material.<\/p>\n<p><em>The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen<\/em> is a disaster on the scale of <em>Batman and Robin<\/em> or <em>Battlefield Earth<\/em>.  Indeed, in some ways, it is an even bigger disappointment than either  of these films. The kernel of the idea was so good and the source  material so exciting that the failure of Norrington\u2019s film to come close  to exploiting all that potential is shattering. Add to that the fact  that this disappointing outing all but guarantees that the brilliant  second story in the sequence will never be adapted to the screen, and  all those involved have a lot to answer for.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: right;\">(Originally published in <em>Matrix<\/em> 163, Sept\/Oct 2003)<\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Comics, at least in the hands of a talented creative teams, are a much denser medium than film. Comics can encompass more visual information and more complex literary ideas, page for page, than a film script. This is certainly true of Stephen Norrington\u2019s attempt to convert Alan Moore and Kevin O\u2019Neill\u2019s The League of Extraordinary [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":722,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[11,8,10],"tags":[51,76,43,46],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/lxg.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p27AP7-bD","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/721"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=721"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/721\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":793,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/721\/revisions\/793"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}