{"id":422,"date":"2011-02-20T16:19:39","date_gmt":"2011-02-20T16:19:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/?p=422"},"modified":"2014-06-24T18:20:31","modified_gmt":"2014-06-24T17:20:31","slug":"digital-britain-opportunity-missed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/?p=422","title":{"rendered":"DIGITAL BRITAIN: OPPORTUNITY MISSED"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/digital_britain_w300-e1298094796554.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-424\" title=\"digital_britain_w300\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/digital_britain_w300-e1298094796554.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"271\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a>The publication of the government\u2019s Digital Britain strategy,  compiled  by Lord Carter and released amid a great deal of hype  in June 2009, fails to address the real issues facing the British media in this new broadcasting era. It represents a most serious missed opportunity  for a  country seeking to play a major role in the future digital  economy.<!--more--><\/h3>\n<p>There  are elements of the report Equity can welcome \u2013 the concern to  increase  access to broadband so that everyone can share in the  benefits of the  new digital era and the focus on putting greater  pressure on those who  steal copyrighted material \u2013 though even here we  believe the government  could have gone further, faster. But these  positive aspects are more  than outweighed by our disappointment at what  is missing from the core  of Lord Carter\u2019s report \u2013 a recognition of  the crucial importance of  unique content production (and especially  drama production) as the  driving force for the spread of technology and  the key to economic  success in the digital economy.<\/p>\n<p>The public service tradition of  British broadcasting has contributed  to our worldwide reputation for  producing  programming of the highest  quality \u2013 programmes that not only  enhances our own cultural experience  but which have made a major  economic contribution through overseas  sales and licensing. Digital  Britain offers nothing to promote UK drama  production and risks  fundamentally undermining the key public service  broadcasters.<\/p>\n<p>Infrastructure  is useless unless there exists high-quality content  which people want  to access and which creates a market for more  services. Digital Britain  commits the government to encouraging the  take-up of broadband  technology and new high-speed networks and to  create an audience that is comfortable with using that technology. There  is no surer way of  achieving both goals than ensuring that those  networks provide access to  high-quality, must-see content \u2013 and  Britain\u2019s long reputation as a  creator of some of the best dramas in  the world puts us in a uniquely  advantageous position \u2013 but one which  Lord Carter\u2019s report entirely  ignores and which the government seems  determined to squander.<\/p>\n<p>The report contains no commitment to new investment in  UK production  \u2013 rather it threatens to spread funding more thinly and  reduce already  falling levels of original content production by sharing  the licence  fee across two public service broadcasters.<\/p>\n<p>Equity  welcomes the commit-ment to drama and children\u2019s television  within the  new remit for Channel 4, but we are concerned that no clear  picture has  emerged as to how this will be financed and the union is  not opposed, in  principle, to a second public service broadcaster  providing the BBC with  competition.<\/p>\n<p>However the union believes this competition should be based  on  quality of output not on a scramble for the same pot of funding. Equity  is opposed to plans to share the BBC licence fee with other   broadcasters and does not believe that the merger of Channel 4 with BBC   Worldwide provides a viable  model for a public service broadcaster   creating high-quality content in the future.<\/p>\n<p>If such competition is to benefit  the viewing public and to form the  basis of a vibrant digital economy  then new money for serious  investment in expanding our national  capabilities as a producer of  content must be found. Traditional sources  of funding are under  pressure so Equity favours the exploitation of new  sources. We believe  that some companies \u2013 broadcasters such as Sky and  internet providers  like YouTube or Google \u2013 are benefiting from public  service programming  while contributing nothing, or very little, to the  industry in terms  of new production and employment. We believe that  levies on such  companies would represent a simple, easily enforceable  and demonstrably  fair way of raising additional funding.<\/p>\n<p>However the money is found, the simple truth absent from Lord Carter\u2019s report remains obvious.<\/p>\n<p>All  the high-speed cables in the world are worthless without  material that  the public want to download. Whether that material is  made in this  country or others will be the key battleground in digital  economy. A  report that seeks to lay the foundations for the future  while ignoring  this fact is fundamentally flawed.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>THE CASE FOR LEVIES<\/h2>\n<p>A report produced for the NUJ and  BECTU by the Institute for Public  Policy Research (IPPR) makes a  powerful case for the introduction of a  system of levies. Mind the  Funding Gap notes that Britain\u2019s public  service brands \u2013 BBC and Channel  4 \u2013 are popular with the public and  internationally respected.  Successful initiatives such as the BBC\u2019s  iPlayer demonstrate that public  service broadcasters (PSBs) can lead  the way in online innovation and  drive the take up of digital  technologies.<\/p>\n<p>Public service content  remains an important part of the services  sold by Sky and VirginMedia,\u00a0 the five major mobile phone operators and  online service providers. A one percent levy on their  revenue would  raise almost \u00a3280 million per year.<\/p>\n<p>The IPPR report  recommends that the government put aside money  raised from the auction  of the areas of the radio spectrum currently  used by analogue television  and use the money as a one-off \u201cwindfall\u201d   fund to support a public  service future.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we value our public service history and  future, it is imperative  that we take steps to protect and promote it,\u201d  the IPPR report  concludes. \u201cThese may not always be universally  supported, particularly  by some industry sectors. However, at the heart  of this debate is the  desire to ensure a future media that is to the  benefit of all citizens  and society. With such high stakes, it is  perhaps unsurprising that  solutions will need to be correspondingly  bold.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Professor Patrick Barwise told a Federation of  Entertainment Unions  conference that a small levy on telecoms and  technology companies could  have a major benefit. The total revenue of UK  broadcasters (including  Sky and VirginMedia) was \u00a312.4billion in 2007  but in the same year  consumer spending on telecoms and the internet was  over \u00a327 billion  with another \u00a320 billion spent on hardware.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo  varying degrees, the growth of all these industries relies on  the  continuing supply of high-quality PSB content. In most cases, that   reliance is increasing,\u201d Professor Barwise told the conference. \u201cPay TV    channels are still watched less than PBS channels but pay TV revenue  is  now much higher than advertising revenue, which is, in turn, still   significantly higher than the proportion of the licence fee that goes to   BBC television.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The BBC receives the smallest slice of  available money but is  responsible for over 90% of the UK\u2019s investment  in original production.  Pay TV, telecoms and the internet use this  content to build their  service but contribute little. A modest levy  could ensure that they  properly contribute to ensuring that that  production continues and even  thrives in the future.<\/p>\n<h2>WHAT IS IN DIGITAL BRITAIN<\/h2>\n<p>The Digital Britain report contains 22 pledges covering everything from mobile phones to fibre optic cabling, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS<\/strong><br \/>\nThe  government aims to make it easier for companies such as BT and  Virgin  Media to extend high-speed communications networks and to look  at  whether subsidies will be needed. The government will also encourage   local initiatives to introduce high-speed networks.<\/li>\n<li><strong>MOBILE WIRELESS<\/strong><br \/>\nEncourage  mobile phone operators to make better use of their networks  and  encourage network sharing. It will also encourage mobile phone  companies  to expand their broadband coverage.<\/li>\n<li><strong>DIGITAL TV<\/strong><br \/>\nThe  process of switching to digital television across the UK is, in the   report\u2019s estimation, going smoothly and it looks forward to using the   money put aside to encourage switch-over to promote other services.<\/li>\n<li><strong>DIGITAL RADIO<\/strong><br \/>\nThe  government says it is committed to making digital radio the primary   radio service and setting up a migration plan from AM and FM to  digital,  but there are no dates and there will be an investigation of  potential  costs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>DIGITAL CONTENT<\/strong><br \/>\nThe government recognises the  challenges a digital economy makes to  producers of music, movies and  games. The report promises legislation  to tackle piracy and places a  duty on internet service providers to  reduce illegal sharing of material  by 70 per cent. It will also look at  ways of encouraging users to  access legal sources of copyright  material. The government will look at  whether people are willing to pay  a \u201cmodest\u201d fee in terms of levies to  offset the costs of piracy.<\/li>\n<li><strong>ORIGINAL UK CONTENT<\/strong><br \/>\nThe  government will carry out a review of local and regional media,  examine  whether the relationship between independent producers and  broadcasters  needs to be reformed and consider creating a second public  service  broadcaster \u2013 using existing funds \u2013 to  provide the BBC with   competition (possibly merging BBC Worldwide with Channel 4).<\/li>\n<li><strong>UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY<\/strong><br \/>\nThe  government wants every home to have a minimum 2mbps broad-band  access  by 2012 and to make broadband access part of the universal  service  obligation. It wants the BBC to lead the way in encouraging  people to  take up broadband and to create a national literacy plan.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: right;\">(Originally published in<em> Equity<\/em> magazine. Summer 2009. \u00a9 Equity)<\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The publication of the government\u2019s Digital Britain strategy, compiled by Lord Carter and released to a great deal of media attention and hype in June 2009, represents a most serious missed opportunity for a country seeking to play a major role in the future digital economy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":424,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[12],"tags":[83,5,38],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/digital_britain_w300-e1298094796554.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p27AP7-6O","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/422"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=422"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/422\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1690,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/422\/revisions\/1690"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mmcgrath.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}