<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Welcome to my world &#187; worldcon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/category/worldcon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hugo winners</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worldcon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/09/01/hugo-winners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well the Hugo winners have been announced.
I&#8217;m surprised but not disappointed that Vinge&#8217;s Rainbows End won (I assumed one of the fantasy novels would get the nod even though I haven&#8217;t read either) I just finished reading it yesterday and thoroughly enjoyed it as an adventure story and as an extended riff on the future [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">Well the Hugo winners have been announced.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">I&#8217;m surprised but not disappointed that Vinge&#8217;s <em>Rainbows End</em> won (I assumed one of the fantasy novels would get the nod even though I haven&#8217;t read either) I just finished reading it yesterday and thoroughly enjoyed it as an adventure story and as an extended riff on the future of communications technology, I rather wish it had existed when I was 18, I think it would have blown my head off. I did, however, feel that there was something essential missing, though what that is, I haven&#8217;t yet decided, I might post  a fuller review when I&#8217;ve had a chance to think about it properly. Still, I think on balance <em>Rainbows End</em> edged out <em>Glasshouse</em> and I didn&#8217;t get on with <em>Blindsight</em> at all, so it looks like Hugo voters got it right this time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">The most annoying thing about <em>Rainbows End</em>, though, is that it is the first Vinge I&#8217;ve read and now I&#8217;ve found another author I&#8217;m going to have to play catch-up on.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">I liked Robert Reed&#8217;s winning novella <em>A Billion Eves</em>, but I preferred Robert Charles Wilson&#8217;s <em>Julian</em> &#8211; again I thought the two were pretty close &#8211; can&#8217;t see how the Swanick story <em>Lord Weary&#8217;s Empire</em> was better than the Wilson though. Not at all.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">Given the choice I&#8217;d have had to split the award between Ian MacDonald&#8217;s <em>The Djinn&#8217;s Wife </em>and <em>Pol Pot&#8217;s Beautiful Daughter (fantasy) </em>by Geoff Ryman so nice to see them sharing the top spots for best novelette. I have no argument with the decision.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">I thought the shortlist for short fiction this year was a disgrace. If those were the best five short stories published in the time period then I&#8217;m a friggin&#8217; Dutchman (no offence Jetse).  Reed&#8217;s &#8220;Eight Episodes&#8221;, the only one I remotely liked came third, proving that I konw nothing.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">For once the best dramatic presentation awards, long and short form, went to the right choices too. I thought <em>Dr Who</em> was over represented on the shortlist but the right episode, &#8220;The Girl in the Fireplace&#8221;, won while I&#8217;m gobsmacked but delighted that <em>Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth</em> saw off the more obvious (and non-subtitled) opposition in the long form category. It is worth noting, giving the discussion that&#8217;s been going on about the future of sf film that this year&#8217;s shortlist was a pretty high-powered list of movies &#8211; <em>The Prestige</em>, <em>Children of Men</em>, <em>V for Vendetta</em> and <em>A Scanner Darkly</em> might all have won on another year.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Verdana">The rest of the awards I have to concede I have no real interest in, but hey, well done Japan, that&#8217;s a pretty good set of winners.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
