<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kicking short fiction to death (or life)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/81/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/81</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:41:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Subterranean 7 &#171; Torque Control</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/81/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Subterranean 7 &#171; Torque Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/10/24/kicking-short-fiction-to-death-or-life/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] Cory Doctorow suggested some possible publicity strategies, and once again various people have commented. (It&#8217;s actually through a publicity strategy of the sort that Doctorow suggested that I ended [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cory Doctorow suggested some possible publicity strategies, and once again various people have commented. (It&#8217;s actually through a publicity strategy of the sort that Doctorow suggested that I ended [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/81/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/10/24/kicking-short-fiction-to-death-or-life/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I think I agree with you about the relative merits of F&amp;SF/Asimov&#039;s -- a couple of years ago it was the reverse, but I&#039;ve been really impressed by recent Asimov&#039;s. It&#039;s a bit unfortunate that the print edition is so ugly as to be unreadable, really.

And re: The Fix and your Analog review: Of course, Analog readers think Asimov&#039;s is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.analogsf.com/discus/messages/1/2284.html?1193283495&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;too fruity&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I agree with you about the relative merits of F&amp;SF/Asimov&#8217;s &#8212; a couple of years ago it was the reverse, but I&#8217;ve been really impressed by recent Asimov&#8217;s. It&#8217;s a bit unfortunate that the print edition is so ugly as to be unreadable, really.</p>
<p>And re: The Fix and your Analog review: Of course, Analog readers think Asimov&#8217;s is <a href="http://www.analogsf.com/discus/messages/1/2284.html?1193283495" rel="nofollow">too fruity</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
