<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugo winners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:24:29 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to my world&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On the death of cyberspace: some rambling thoughts on Vinge and Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to my world&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On the death of cyberspace: some rambling thoughts on Vinge and Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/09/01/hugo-winners/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] 01/09/2007: Hugo winners [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 01/09/2007: Hugo winners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68/comment-page-1#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/09/01/hugo-winners/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>No, I’ll concede 2007 hasn’t been a vintage year for sf films. Of the blockbusters only &lt;i&gt;Transformers&lt;/i&gt; was any kind of fun, even if it was a billion kinds of dumb. I guess the Hugo list will probably be made up of a selection from:

Films I&#039;ve seen and liked:
&lt;i&gt;Sunshine&lt;/i&gt; – I really liked this, though I know it’s gobbledegook science annoyed lots of fans.
&lt;i&gt;Stardust&lt;/i&gt; – I’m guessing that this it will win by a mile.
&lt;i&gt;28 Weeks Later&lt;/i&gt; – maybe not as good as the first one, but some terrific directorial flourishes, though the script felt as though it had been utterly mangled.

Films I haven’t yet seen, but still have hope for:

&lt;i&gt;The Nines&lt;/i&gt; – a lot of people I know loved this.
&lt;i&gt;Southland Tales&lt;/i&gt; – the birth of &lt;i&gt;Donnie Darko&lt;/i&gt; was almost as controversial, so maybe the final cut will be great.
&lt;i&gt;The Golden Compass&lt;/i&gt; – I’m not  a fan of the books particularly but I’m approaching this with an open mind, big budget but will there be any room left for imagination?
&lt;i&gt;Doomsday&lt;/i&gt; – Brit flick might be good, might be a disaster.

And I’m not sure on the eligibility rules – but &lt;i&gt;Paprika&lt;/i&gt;, made in Japan in 2006, distributed in the West in 2007 and &lt;i&gt;The Host&lt;/i&gt; (ditto, except it’s Korean) were worth people’s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I’ll concede 2007 hasn’t been a vintage year for sf films. Of the blockbusters only <i>Transformers</i> was any kind of fun, even if it was a billion kinds of dumb. I guess the Hugo list will probably be made up of a selection from:</p>
<p>Films I&#8217;ve seen and liked:<br />
<i>Sunshine</i> – I really liked this, though I know it’s gobbledegook science annoyed lots of fans.<br />
<i>Stardust</i> – I’m guessing that this it will win by a mile.<br />
<i>28 Weeks Later</i> – maybe not as good as the first one, but some terrific directorial flourishes, though the script felt as though it had been utterly mangled.</p>
<p>Films I haven’t yet seen, but still have hope for:</p>
<p><i>The Nines</i> – a lot of people I know loved this.<br />
<i>Southland Tales</i> – the birth of <i>Donnie Darko</i> was almost as controversial, so maybe the final cut will be great.<br />
<i>The Golden Compass</i> – I’m not  a fan of the books particularly but I’m approaching this with an open mind, big budget but will there be any room left for imagination?<br />
<i>Doomsday</i> – Brit flick might be good, might be a disaster.</p>
<p>And I’m not sure on the eligibility rules – but <i>Paprika</i>, made in Japan in 2006, distributed in the West in 2007 and <i>The Host</i> (ditto, except it’s Korean) were worth people’s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/68/comment-page-1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/09/01/hugo-winners/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;(I assumed one of the fantasy novels would get the nod even though I haven’t read either)&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

One of ...? There was only one fantasy novel on the ballot -- Temeraire.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;It is worth noting, giving the discussion that’s been going on about the future of sf film that this year’s shortlist was a pretty high-powered list&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, but there&#039;s sod-all to nominate&lt;a href=&quot;http://community.livejournal.com/instant_fanzine/190989.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;from this year&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;(I assumed one of the fantasy novels would get the nod even though I haven’t read either)&#8221;</i></p>
<p>One of &#8230;? There was only one fantasy novel on the ballot &#8212; Temeraire.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;It is worth noting, giving the discussion that’s been going on about the future of sf film that this year’s shortlist was a pretty high-powered list&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yeah, but there&#8217;s sod-all to nominate<a href="http://community.livejournal.com/instant_fanzine/190989.html" rel="nofollow">from this year</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
