<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is sf ready for prime time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/41/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/41</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:41:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Endless Links &#171; Torque Control</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Endless Links &#171; Torque Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/06/30/is-sf-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Martin McGrath and Lou Anders comment on Gareth McLean&#8217;s Guardian article on SF TV. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Martin McGrath and Lou Anders comment on Gareth McLean&#8217;s Guardian article on SF TV. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle Hopwood</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle Hopwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/06/30/is-sf-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Battlestar Galactica&#039;s creators and actors went out of their way to claim to BSG was NOT SF. (Despite it showing on SciFi channel; go figure.) Dave Langford&#039;s Ansible alone has 6 &quot;as others see us&quot; references.

Here&#039;s a couple:
Ronald D.Moore, a writer and executive producer of the new Battlestar Galactica, explains how it is Importantly Different: `&quot;It&#039;s just fleshed-out reality,&quot; said Moore. &quot;It&#039;s surprising to see because it&#039;s not in the science-fiction genre. Sci-fi doesn&#039;t usually treat adult men and women as adult men and women, and we wanted to treat them as adults.&quot;&#039; (Washington Post, December)

Katee Sackhoff, who plays Starbuck in the series, seems to agree: `I&#039;ll meet people who haven&#039;t watched the show purely because it&#039;s on Sci Fi. I&#039;m like, you&#039;ve gotta be kidding me. It&#039;s not really science fiction. [...] they&#039;ve turned it into a drama first and a science-fiction series second.&#039;

I guess when pressed I&#039;d say SF is now almost universally loved in the west, but the vast majority of the consumers are still embarrassed to admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Battlestar Galactica&#8217;s creators and actors went out of their way to claim to BSG was NOT SF. (Despite it showing on SciFi channel; go figure.) Dave Langford&#8217;s Ansible alone has 6 &#8220;as others see us&#8221; references.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a couple:<br />
Ronald D.Moore, a writer and executive producer of the new Battlestar Galactica, explains how it is Importantly Different: `&#8221;It&#8217;s just fleshed-out reality,&#8221; said Moore. &#8220;It&#8217;s surprising to see because it&#8217;s not in the science-fiction genre. Sci-fi doesn&#8217;t usually treat adult men and women as adult men and women, and we wanted to treat them as adults.&#8221;&#8216; (Washington Post, December)</p>
<p>Katee Sackhoff, who plays Starbuck in the series, seems to agree: `I&#8217;ll meet people who haven&#8217;t watched the show purely because it&#8217;s on Sci Fi. I&#8217;m like, you&#8217;ve gotta be kidding me. It&#8217;s not really science fiction. [...] they&#8217;ve turned it into a drama first and a science-fiction series second.&#8217;</p>
<p>I guess when pressed I&#8217;d say SF is now almost universally loved in the west, but the vast majority of the consumers are still embarrassed to admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/06/30/is-sf-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know Jeremiah, while I could possibly buy this for shows like Lost and maybe Heroes I think that people clearly understand BSG and Dr Who (or Primeval, or Torchwood or, I&#039;m guessing, the forthcoming Outcast) as definitively sfnal - to the point that minstream positive reviews frequently start off with disclaimers like &quot;ignore the fact that this is geeky science fiction&quot;...

Producers might hide behind phrases like &quot;high-concept&quot; when they can&#039;t bring themselves to say the sf words, but I don&#039;t think they&#039;re fooling anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Jeremiah, while I could possibly buy this for shows like Lost and maybe Heroes I think that people clearly understand BSG and Dr Who (or Primeval, or Torchwood or, I&#8217;m guessing, the forthcoming Outcast) as definitively sfnal &#8211; to the point that minstream positive reviews frequently start off with disclaimers like &#8220;ignore the fact that this is geeky science fiction&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Producers might hide behind phrases like &#8220;high-concept&#8221; when they can&#8217;t bring themselves to say the sf words, but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re fooling anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Tolbert</title>
		<link>http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Tolbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmcgrath.co.uk/2007/06/30/is-sf-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the public (and the show creators) don&#039;t see these shows as SF. (The creators might, but you&#039;ll be hardpressed to get any of them to admit it on the record.) I think genre ideas have become ingrained in popular culture, though, but they don&#039;t &quot;belong&quot; to SF anymore, which has too many negative connotations for most of the public to want to associate with it.  SF won, and lost, at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the public (and the show creators) don&#8217;t see these shows as SF. (The creators might, but you&#8217;ll be hardpressed to get any of them to admit it on the record.) I think genre ideas have become ingrained in popular culture, though, but they don&#8217;t &#8220;belong&#8221; to SF anymore, which has too many negative connotations for most of the public to want to associate with it.  SF won, and lost, at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
